Re: A small update for postgresql.conf.sample

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Hackers ML <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A small update for postgresql.conf.sample
Date: 2010-09-27 13:45:57
Message-ID: AANLkTikr4SpfRpE69pzGJhYw853hgvcVju5864outWzb@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/9/27 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>:
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> > Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it.
>>
>> I was wondering if it would cause package management headaches for
>> people who had already modified their postgresql.conf.
>
> We don't overwrite .conf files during upgrades.

All right, have it your way. Done. :-)

(Dang this is a lot easier than the old way.)

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-09-27 14:03:55 Re: gist access methods parameter types
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-27 13:42:47 Re: Patch: Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint