On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 3:52 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I agree to get rid of write_location.
>> No, don't remove it.
>> We seem to be just looking for things to tweak without any purpose.
>> Removing this adds nothing for us.
>> We will have the column in the future, it is there now, so leave it.
> Well then can we revert the part of your patch that causes it to not
> actually work any more?
Specifically, if we're not going to remove write location, then I
think we need to apply something like the attached.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Radosław Smogura||Date: 2011-03-23 15:50:06|
|Subject: Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-03-23 15:24:30|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled