On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com> wrote:
> On 26/03/11 14:35, Dave Cramer wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:37 PM, MauMau<maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> 1. Better JDBC4 support
>>> I'd like the driver to support more JDBC4 features, regardless of whether
>>> they are actually useful. Just lack of support could lead to
>>> when compared to other databases such as Oracle and HSQLDB (IIRC, HSQLDB
>>> provides better JDBC4 support). I love PostgreSQL and don't want my
>>> colleagues to underevaluate PostgreSQL.
>> So looking at some of the stuff in JDBC4 one simple thing is that many
>> times we throw not implemented when we should be throwing
> That may very well help, I did a grep last month of all the places where the
> not implemented exception is as a way to work out what work could be done
> (see http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2011-02/msg00087.php). Though
> I've only had a little time to look since, there were some features that I
> thought just weren't possible with Postgres so perhaps it's worth discussing
> what features can be supported and need developing and which methods should
> be changed to throw the better exception.
> One feature that I noticed that isn't implemented is named parameters on
> prepared statements. From a cursory glance I believe that it is possible to
> that with Postgres, but I note that it's never been implemented for JDBC 2
> and upwards. Unless someone tells me it's technically not possible I'd be
> prepared to invest some time over the coming weeks to add that feature.
> Mike Fowler
> Registered Linux user: 379787
Thanks Mike, that would be great!
In response to
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2011-03-27 13:31:33|
|Subject: Re: JDBC gripe list|
|Previous:||From: Thomas Kellerer||Date: 2011-03-27 10:40:21|
|Subject: Link to the documentation on jdbc.postgresql.org|