On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 8:54 AM, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
> (2010/09/24 20:56), Robert Haas wrote:
>> 2010/9/23 KaiGai Kohei<kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
>>>> Please see
>>> OK, I'll emulate this approach at first.
>> Don't worry about this part - I will do this myself. If you can just
>> fix the pg_dump stuff, I think we will be in pretty good shape.
> Ahh, I already did this part at the today's afternoon:
> And, the pg_dump stuff has been just implemented(, but not tested yet):
> If you prefer to keep the patch small, I'll revert the system_views.sql
> in the next patch.
It probably doesn't matter much - it'll likely take me about the same
amount of time to check your work as it would to do it myself, so it's
pretty much six of one, half a dozen of the other.
The Enterprise Postgres Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Aidan Van Dyk||Date: 2010-09-24 13:01:54|
|Subject: Re: Configuring synchronous replication|
|Previous:||From: KaiGai Kohei||Date: 2010-09-24 12:54:21|
|Subject: Re: security label support, revised|