Re: PG 9.0 release timetable

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 release timetable
Date: 2010-05-31 15:39:28
Message-ID: AANLkTikgpBNqsmLtw7sI2OTRR8J5KaoTwt_QuXgm0-kS@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Marc G. Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> My guess would be "most of them".
>
> Do we not have any stats on # of beta downloads per package type?  I use FreeBSD ports when installing production, but when testing non-released code, I generally use the source code itself and build ...

No. Most packages don't come off the postgresql.org servers - they
come out of the yum repositories, the deb repositories or the edb
download servers (windows).

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2010-05-31 15:41:40 Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-05-31 15:37:44 Re: PG 9.0 release timetable