On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I would think it would be purely syntatic sugar really, which does
>> incorporate a familiar interface for those who are working in
>> different
>> worlds (.Net/Drupal/JAVA) etc...
>
> I wouldn't mind having something more standard supported; I'm always looking up the conninfo for the options I don't use frequently.

I have a sneaking suspicion that the options you have to look up won't
be any more obvious (or standardized) in a URI connection string.

That said, I do support adding this in the future, if only to keep up
with the Jones'.

-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

• Re: Should psql support URI syntax? at 2011-04-01 00:10:36 from Joshua Berkus

Responses

• Re: Should psql support URI syntax? at 2011-04-01 08:34:26 from Magnus Hagander

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Shigeru HANADA	Date: 2011-04-01 08:29:28
	Subject: Re: Foreign table permissions and cloning
Previous:	From: Noah Misch	Date: 2011-04-01 07:52:22
	Subject: Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC