Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Should psql support URI syntax?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Should psql support URI syntax?
Date: 2011-04-01 08:24:00
Message-ID: AANLkTikgTzZTBuQKPABRzbjFZVoGW+72bgg8TbEg4gaN@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I would think it would be purely syntatic sugar really, which does
>> incorporate a familiar interface for those who are working in
>> different
>> worlds (.Net/Drupal/JAVA) etc...
>
> I wouldn't mind having something more standard supported; I'm always looking up the conninfo for the options I don't use frequently.

I have a sneaking suspicion that the options you have to look up won't
be any more obvious (or standardized) in a URI connection string.

That said, I do support adding this in the future, if only to keep up
with the Jones'.

-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Shigeru HANADADate: 2011-04-01 08:29:28
Subject: Re: Foreign table permissions and cloning
Previous:From: Noah MischDate: 2011-04-01 07:52:22
Subject: Re: maximum digits for NUMERIC

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group