Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Additional index entries and table sorting

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Additional index entries and table sorting
Date: 2010-11-05 22:33:17
Message-ID: AANLkTikcrUfRB=T4dQNNCbnGKYxLv1XZTwUwAbL0hxqZ@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
On 28 October 2010 20:15, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>
> It was already inconsistent in the SGML, but if you wish, I'll redo it so
> that they're all in tables.  That will mean taking the sections which kept
> index terms outside of tables already, and merging them with all the tables.
>  Will take me a while.


Okay, here's another version, moving index entries back from separate lists
into function tables, although I think I've done that for more than just my
own changes.

-- 
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

Attachment: doc_index_updates_v2.patch.gz
Description: application/x-gzip (14.2 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Marti RaudseppDate: 2010-11-09 10:21:54
Subject: plpython docs should say 'plpy.Error' instead of ERROR
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-11-04 18:34:12
Subject: Re: Large SGML Cleanup

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2010-11-05 22:39:01
Subject: Re: Simplifying replication
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2010-11-05 22:33:03
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group