Re: Re: Mailing list archives

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Matteo Beccati <php(at)beccati(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tim Bunce <tim(dot)bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Re: Mailing list archives
Date: 2010-11-24 13:33:20
Message-ID: AANLkTikc-2hrzxP7yXKj4B2fcOkUF_N8gXSyi8Wx=FRt@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Matteo Beccati <php(at)beccati(dot)com> wrote:
> I've looked into it and the issue is that I'm displaying only part "1",
> whereas that email had a multipart/alternative format with parts "1.1"
> and "1.2". When we get closer to getting the code to production, we can
> think about fixing it.

When will we get closer to getting the code to production?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-11-24 13:41:36 Re: Suggested "easy" TODO: pg_dump --from-list
Previous Message Itagaki Takahiro 2010-11-24 13:28:08 Re: Extensions, this time with a patch

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matteo Beccati 2010-11-24 14:51:55 Re: Re: Mailing list archives
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-23 17:18:00 Re: Why was anoncvs taken offline, exactly?