On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> In any case, unless you're willing to commit to testing every
>> change/new feature on 7.3, 7.4, 8.0 and 8.1, we shouldn't pretend
>> they're supported.
> I'm not willing to do that. If it's not much work, I can still work on
> that, but I for sure don't commit to do that. What I would prefer us to
> do is allow the connection to an old unmaintained server with a big
> warning telling that 1. they should upgrade PostgreSQL, and 2. they
> could encounter bugs in pgAdmin as we don't commit to fix them with
> unmaintained PostgreSQL releases.
I'm fine with that (like I said, that's what I thought would happen
I'll look into it.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Guillaume Lelarge||Date: 2010-10-24 15:23:03|
|Subject: Re: pgAdmin III commit: Updated supported versions
for 1.14. Now that we ha|
|Previous:||From: Guillaume Lelarge||Date: 2010-10-24 15:10:28|
|Subject: Re: 4 spaces versus tabs|