On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> Le 24/10/2010 08:13, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>>> In any case, unless you're willing to commit to testing every
>>>> change/new feature on 7.3, 7.4, 8.0 and 8.1, we shouldn't pretend
>>>> they're supported.
>>> I'm not willing to do that. If it's not much work, I can still work on
>>> that, but I for sure don't commit to do that. What I would prefer us to
>>> do is allow the connection to an old unmaintained server with a big
>>> warning telling that 1. they should upgrade PostgreSQL, and 2. they
>>> could encounter bugs in pgAdmin as we don't commit to fix them with
>>> unmaintained PostgreSQL releases.
>> I'm fine with that (like I said, that's what I thought would happen
>> anyway). Oops.
>> I'll look into it.
> Thanks :)
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Guillaume Lelarge||Date: 2010-10-25 14:39:41|
|Subject: Re: pgAdmin III commit: Updated supported versions
for 1.14. Now that we ha|
|Previous:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2010-10-25 11:54:15|
|Subject: pgAdmin III commit: Allow the user to carry on working with anunsuppor|