Re: string function - "format" function proposal

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: string function - "format" function proposal
Date: 2010-09-06 15:05:29
Message-ID: AANLkTikY7kyidk3e3PGkY-VcST6Su3=Wsne97FqxrQXk@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/9/6 Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> So?  You'd need to quote the values anyway, in general.  If you want
>> something that will be valid SQL you'd better include the functionality
>> of quote_literal() in it.
>>
>> I'm not sure that it's a good idea to have any type-specific special
>> cases.
>
> As I remember, the original motivation of %v formatter is
> some DBMSes don't like quoted numeric literals. However,
> Postgres accepts quoted numerics, and we're developing Postgres.
>
> So, our consensus would be %v formatter should be removed
> completely from the format function.
>

I think so tag that quotes all without numbers can be very useful, but
it isn't too much important for me. I can live without them.

Regards

Pavel

> --
> Itagaki Takahiro
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Haggerty 2010-09-06 15:32:00 Re: git: uh-oh
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-06 14:53:35 Re: git: uh-oh