Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: SSL cipher and version

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSL cipher and version
Date: 2010-07-27 23:43:51
Message-ID: AANLkTikXJM0Eoky8Dq5ZvjcM-=RcsSOQkZ5Shb88bcRr@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Any objections to me committing this?
>>>
>>> Might wanna fix this first:
>>>
>>> +PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(ssl_veresion);
>>>                                         ^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>> Wow.  It works remarkably well without fixing that, but I'll admit
>> that does seem lucky.
>
> Well, it's got no arguments, which is the main thing that works
> differently in call protocol V1.  I think you'd find that the
> PG_RETURN_NULL case doesn't really work though ...

It seems to work, but it might be that something's broken under the hood.

Anyhow, committed with that correction.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-07-27 23:47:20
Subject: Re: Parsing of aggregate ORDER BY clauses
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-07-27 23:41:29
Subject: Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group