From: | Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin(dot)dizdarevic(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Info on non supported Features |
Date: | 2011-01-10 10:31:58 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikWBL2eDeLMNf17jvnt4F9_Z5=8SSevcF-sqifW@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
2011/1/10 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
> Le 10/01/2011 11:07, Jasmin Dizdarevic a écrit :
> > Sure, it's possible, but then you have take care of each control
> > individually. Setting a text in a combobx and checkbox is quiet
> different.
> > I think this change is acceptable, because the label control is kept.
> Only
> > the control, which is also not accessible by a tab is hidden.
> >
> >
> > Radio buttons could not be covered this way. The items would have to be
> > disabled manually.
> >
> > Resizing should not be a problem (in my test there were no problems),
> > because the control is replaced through wxSizer::Replace(). So it's kept
> in
> > the "grid flow".
> >
>
> "Resizing should not be a problem"... that's a good one :-D
>
Have you ever had problems with it? ;-)
>
> I hope you're right. But, from my experience, there's always something
> weird in resizing.
>
As I can see and can understand what you mean - there are really no issues,
I've just replaces a comment field that grows with the window and there are
no issues. Also overloading the textfield with text (> 150 signs) works
perfect.
>
>
> --
> Guillaume
> http://www.postgresql.fr
> http://dalibo.com
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jasmin Dizdarevic | 2011-01-10 10:35:22 | Re: New options dialog |
Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2011-01-10 10:19:02 | Re: Info on non supported Features |