Re: multiset patch review

From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: multiset patch review
Date: 2011-02-04 18:15:53
Message-ID: AANLkTikT4E9wcHwaxkwEKb1zQMOT==OM_ZpE_bL253fa@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 03:04, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I am still not in favor of adding this syntax.
>>
>> I also don't like the syntax, but unfortunately, almost all of
>> them are in the SQL standard :-(.
>
> The standard specifies this syntax for arrays, or for multisets?

Multisets. But I chose the same function name and syntax because
arrays *are* multisets by definition.

--
Itagaki Takahiro

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-02-04 18:16:10 Re: more buildfarm breakage
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2011-02-04 18:06:27 Re: keeping a timestamp of the last stats reset (for a db, table and function)