Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet
Date: 2010-09-07 16:42:07
Message-ID: AANLkTikSK8Cs5MAntyD9umagQhoEur_LS1JPre=P3BOQ@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2010/9/7 Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>:
>> on 32bit from 27MB (3399 blocks) to 13MB (1564 blocks)
>> on 64bit from 55MB to cca 27MB.
>
> Good results. But, I think, there are more places in ispell to use
> hold_memory():
> - affixes and affix tree
> - regis (REGex for ISpell, regis.c)

yes, but minimally for Czech dictionary other places are not
important. It's decrease 1MB more.

Last month I moved all these unreleased parts and it's not important.
But can be interesting check it for other languages than Czech.

Regards

Pavel Stehule

>
>
> --
> Teodor Sigaev                                   E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
>                                                   WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
>

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-09-07 16:42:34
Subject: Re: patch: tsearch - some memory diet
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2010-09-07 16:39:49
Subject: Re: function_name.parameter_name

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group