| From: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "McGehee, Robert" <Robert(dot)McGehee(at)geodecapital(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Unable to drop role |
| Date: | 2010-08-24 16:28:56 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikRR-VjgkCFXCG8+D719sWz-4RJPOVCj3toz7zc@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 07:36, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I can see how "access to" might be read as specifically meaning "CONNECT
> privilege for". Should we change this message from "access to whatever"
> to "privileges for whatever", or some such wording?
+1, There have been a few times I found that message not very um helpful.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2010-08-24 16:32:05 | Re: replication solution |
| Previous Message | Ullah, Syed | 2010-08-24 16:19:11 | Problem with \set command |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Eric Simon | 2010-08-24 16:43:59 | Re: Problem Using PQcancel in a Synchronous Query |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-08-24 16:27:20 | Re: Typing Records |