| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects |
| Date: | 2011-04-01 17:17:26 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikOmToiUCJJNg=7eGGG6fzoGaFD_TH5Ps=-2pM7@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Shigeru HANADA
<hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> - pg_dump support for comment on fdw and server
Applied, good catch, thanks.
> - psql describe commands (\dew+ and \des+)
Not sure if we want this behavior change or not. Any other opinions?
It doesn't look like there's any particular consistency in terms of
which backslash commands include a description always (e.g. \dT),
which ones include it only when + is specified (e.g. \dt), and which
don't include it at all (e.g. \dc).
> - psql TAB completion
Committed this also.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2011-04-01 17:17:34 | Re: Should psql support URI syntax? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2011-04-01 17:12:44 | Re: Should psql support URI syntax? |