Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Shigeru HANADA <hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Comments on SQL/Med objects
Date: 2011-04-01 17:17:26
Message-ID: AANLkTikOmToiUCJJNg=7eGGG6fzoGaFD_TH5Ps=-2pM7@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Shigeru HANADA
<hanada(at)metrosystems(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>  - pg_dump support for comment on fdw and server

Applied, good catch, thanks.

>  - psql describe commands (\dew+ and \des+)

Not sure if we want this behavior change or not.  Any other opinions?
It doesn't look like there's any particular consistency in terms of
which backslash commands include a description always (e.g. \dT),
which ones include it only when + is specified (e.g. \dt), and which
don't include it at all (e.g. \dc).

>  - psql TAB completion

Committed this also.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Christopher BrowneDate: 2011-04-01 17:17:34
Subject: Re: Should psql support URI syntax?
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2011-04-01 17:12:44
Subject: Re: Should psql support URI syntax?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group