On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Itagaki Takahiro
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 12:17:02PM +0900, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
>>> There are some "== true" in the codes, but they might not be safe
>>> because all non-zero values are true in C. Is it worth cleaning up them?
>
> Here is a proposed cleanup that replaces "boolean == true" with "boolean".
> I didn't touch "== false" unless they are not in pairs of comparisons
> with true because comparison with false is a valid C code.
It looks like you have one or two irrelevant whitespace changes in ecpg.c.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
| Next: | From: Stephen Frost | Date: 2010-11-04 13:35:16 |
| Subject: Re: contrib: auth_delay module |
| Previous: | From: Jan UrbaĆski | Date: 2010-11-04 13:13:34 |
| Subject: Re: contrib: auth_delay module |