On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
>> What's weird about using the role name? That's our standard way of
>> distinguishing between two or more users. Why invent something new?
> wel a user is not a host/server for me - given there is no real benefit from
> using distinct roles for each standby yet I don't see why we should
> complicate the replication setup procedure by requiring 1 role per standby.
> So I'm all for giving each standby a name but please make it an explicit one
> and not something that is only vaguely related to the actual standby host.
OK. If that's the consensus, can someone post a patch?
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2010-12-31 14:38:29|
|Subject: Re: Streaming replication as a separate permissions|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2010-12-31 13:52:49|
|Subject: Re: and it's not a bunny rabbit, either|