Re: Regression testing for psql

From: Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, alvherre <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Regression testing for psql
Date: 2010-05-30 00:37:59
Message-ID: AANLkTikMIXs17fhQtlZiBPU2drxMpVkgXU5N6gm8w2AF@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> There might be some value in psql backslash command tests that
>> are designed to depend on just one or a few tables (or other appropriate
>> objects).
>
> Updated, much much smaller, patch attached.  Also available, again, at
> http://snowman.net/~sfrost/psql-regress-help.patch
>
> Basically, I removed anything that would produce data directly from
> the catalogs by trying to find a 'none' object which matched.  This
> still goes through alot of the same setup and query, it's just that
> there aren't any results.

Is this something to be added to 2010-07 commitfest?

-selena

--
http://chesnok.com/daily - me

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2010-05-30 01:53:14 Re: pg_trgm
Previous Message David Fetter 2010-05-29 23:32:48 Re: small exclusion constraints patch