On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Oleg,
>
> * Oleg Bartunov (oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su) wrote:
>> what do you need for documentation ? From users point of view we add just
>> knn support and all examples are available in btree_gist.sql and sql
>> subdirectory. Contact me directly, if you have questions.
>
> It sure seems like
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/btree-gist.html could be and
> should be improved, in general..  If this module is really still just a
> test bed for GiST, then perhaps it's not a big deal..

I agree that the documentation there could be a lot better, but I
don't think that's a commit-blocker for this patch.  However, "us
reaching beta" will be a commit-blocker.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

• Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) at 2011-02-12 12:47:16 from Stephen Frost

Responses

• Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof) at 2011-02-16 21:33:40 from Robert Haas

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Stephen Frost	Date: 2011-02-12 13:27:18
	Subject: Re: multiset patch review
Previous:	From: Stephen Frost	Date: 2011-02-12 12:47:16
	Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:	From: Oleg Bartunov	Date: 2011-02-12 15:53:33
	Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Previous:	From: Stephen Frost	Date: 2011-02-12 12:47:16
	Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)