Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Date: 2011-02-12 13:19:09
Message-ID: AANLkTikM2VpD3baVgU+8tgWXfeTQrHBhgpw9RzEWCk-1@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-rrreviewers
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Oleg,
>
> * Oleg Bartunov (oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su) wrote:
>> what do you need for documentation ? From users point of view we add just
>> knn support and all examples are available in btree_gist.sql and sql
>> subdirectory. Contact me directly, if you have questions.
>
> It sure seems like
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/btree-gist.html could be and
> should be improved, in general..  If this module is really still just a
> test bed for GiST, then perhaps it's not a big deal..

I agree that the documentation there could be a lot better, but I
don't think that's a commit-blocker for this patch.  However, "us
reaching beta" will be a commit-blocker.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2011-02-12 13:27:18
Subject: Re: multiset patch review
Previous:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2011-02-12 12:47:16
Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2011-02-12 15:53:33
Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Previous:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2011-02-12 12:47:16
Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group