Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch
Date: 2010-08-08 18:16:45
Message-ID: AANLkTikKOWt21gYN=h319YWts23-CFZEoQedZZ8JL9cE@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/8/8 David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>:
> On Aug 8, 2010, at 9:10 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>>> There are no keys.
>>
>> ok - I didn't use a correct name - so "indexed set" is better.
>
> Hash?

Just only hash isn't good model, because I sometimes we would prefer a
ordered set

Regards

Pavel

>
> David
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-08-08 19:18:17 Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2010-08-08 18:05:53 Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch