Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Number of selected characters.

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: Vinicius Santos <vinicius(dot)santos(dot)lista(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Number of selected characters.
Date: 2011-01-21 09:16:49
Message-ID: AANLkTikJpvV4_0EsR-u3kC0NxYZu8TLnedF1k7Le2mO6@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Le 04/01/2011 17:34, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>> Le 04/01/2011 16:27, Dave Page a écrit :
>>>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>>>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>>>> Ch is not obvious either. But, what about Sel?
>>>>
>>>> It is obvious when it changes to a new value every time you move the
>>>> cursor. Sl (or Sel) isn't - you don't see it change in normal
>>>> operation.
>>>>
>>>
>>> We could hide it when there is no selection.
>>
>> It it had it's own panel, was empty when there was no selection, and
>> had a slightly more descriptive text ("N chars"?), I could probably
>> live with it.
>>
>
> Done. Patch and screenshots attached.
>
> Does it look like what you intended?

Much better - though I still think it should say:

33 chars

not

sel 33

which is pretty cryptic.

-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2011-01-21 09:17:34
Subject: Re: Number of selected characters.
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-01-21 09:16:29
Subject: Re: Support for pg_stat_database_conflicts and pg_stat_replication

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group