From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build |
Date: | 2011-01-19 09:12:45 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikJh7XGZD+SE=pwfnPJxkZT=0RSY9rUDUzd5gge@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
And hopefully Magnus will be able to help here too!
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Peter Geoghegan
<peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Seems I omitted to copy my system's FlexLexer.h to
> ./pgadmin3/pgadmin/include/pgscript. Seemingly the FlexLexer.h that
> ships with pgadmin is for Flex 2.5.33 only. I have 2.5.35.
>
> However, I now get a slightly different set of compiler errors, so I'm
> not much better off.
>
> pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:944:10: error: ‘yy_buffer_stack’ was not declared
> in this scope
> pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:944:10: error: ‘yy_buffer_stack_top’ was not
> declared in this scope
> pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:945:27: error: ‘yyensure_buffer_stack’ was not
> declared in this scope
> pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:1858:8: error: ‘yy_buffer_stack’ was not declared
> in this scope
>
> ...and so on...
>
> Why do we ship a copy of FlexLexer.h from a specific version of
> flex++? Are we really that sensitive to the differences in Flex
> versions? Is the easiest thing to get pgadmin to build after changing
> the pgscript grammar to use flex 2.5.33, as perhaps suggested in
> ./pgadmin3/pgadmin/pgscript/README?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Peter Geoghegan
>
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2011-01-19 11:20:07 | Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2011-01-19 09:11:58 | Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build |