Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Interpretability with xDBC specification

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
Cc: Sumit Pandya <sumit(dot)pandya(at)elitecore(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Interpretability with xDBC specification
Date: 2010-07-06 14:27:13
Message-ID: AANLkTikIW1VcuXRQC4Yb5RX3ktEvqN41Az2EiRInfGXC@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> wrote:
> Sumit Pandya wrote:
>
>>     Please excuse me if there is already such FAQ/White-Paper and in that
>> case share link.
>
> http://jdbc.postgresql.org/todo.html might be a start.
>
> If you'd like to prepare a compliance table yourself, I'm sure the list
> would be interested in the results. I should forewarn you, though, that
> the last time I checked, obtaining and setting up the JDBC CTS or TCK
> was a lot of work.

We actually got it to pass at one point when SUN was interested, and
they did most of the work.

Unfortunately you have to bend postgresql in ways it was never
intended to work to get it to pass.

Dave

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2010-07-06 15:03:43
Subject: Re: Interpretability with xDBC specification
Previous:From: Oliver JowettDate: 2010-07-06 14:15:45
Subject: Re: Interpretability with xDBC specification

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group