Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid)

From: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)gluefinance(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Herrera Alvaro <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid)
Date: 2011-01-09 01:02:09
Message-ID: AANLkTikFh33EtmuMGaA-bhxL+Ob+pWd+xfn1S8LQ528L@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/1/9 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Oops.  I misread your query.  I thought the duplicates were because
> you were feeding pg_describe_object the same classoid, objoid,
> objsubid pair more than once, but I see now that's not the case (UNION
> != UNION ALL).

Ah, I see, yes, the query should actually be UNION, it would produce
the same result, but perhaps it would be a bit faster.

--
Best regards,

Joel Jacobson
Glue Finance

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-01-09 01:31:07 Re: DISCARD ALL ; stored procedures
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2011-01-09 00:52:04 Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid)