On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
> On 18.03.2011 17:38, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 10:27 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> ...which might have something to recommend it.
>> Works for me.
> Yes, sounds reasonable. Without "WARNING_", please.
The reason I included WARNING is because warnings have their own
section in errcodes.txt, and each errcode is marked E for error or W
for warning. Since we CAN'T actually error out here, I thought it
might be more appropriate to make this a warning; and all of the
existing such codes contain WARNING.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-03-18 16:46:03|
|Subject: Re: pgindent (was Re: Header comments in the recently added files)|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-03-18 16:33:26|
|Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled