On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 15:38, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:54, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> On ons, 2010-12-29 at 11:09 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> I've applied this version (with some minor typo-fixes).
>> This page is now somewhat invalidated:
> Hmm. Somehow I missed that page completely when looking through the
> docs. I'll go update that.
BTW, shouldn't CONNECTION LIMIT be listed on that page? and INHERIT?
And VALID UNTIL? They're all role attributes, no? At least the last
two certainly interact with the authentication system...
>> First, it doesn't mention the replication privilege, and second it
>> continues to claim that superuser status bypasses all permission checks.
> Well, that was *already* wrong.
> superuser doesn't bypass NOLOGIN.
> That doesn't mean it shouldn't be fixed, but that's independent of the
> replication role.
I've committed a fix for this.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2011-01-03 11:10:40|
|Subject: Re: Sync Rep Design|
|Previous:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2011-01-03 10:35:40|
|Subject: Re: Recovery conflict monitoring|