Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: back branches vs. VS 2008

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: back branches vs. VS 2008
Date: 2011-01-03 17:43:08
Message-ID: AANLkTikCw54bT_1N7bMm3eJtO+ypx4UFf+x9Zmgf7ezr@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 18:15, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
> The following patch allows me to build the 8.3 and 8.4 branches using Visual
> Studio 2008, once the build system is patched. But I don't really know why.
> HEAD and 9.0 build fine without it. But those branches branches fail with a
> complaint about IPPROTO_IPV6 being undefined.
>
> The patch seems harmless enough. But I'd like to know why it's happening.
> Does anyone have a clue?

Umm. Since when do we backpatch new features/platforms?

I don't know exactly why that is happening, but it's a good indicator
that backpatching it isn't necessarily safe - what else can be missed?

-- 
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2011-01-03 17:48:57
Subject: Re: Re: new patch of MERGE (merge_204) & a question about duplicated ctid
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2011-01-03 17:15:06
Subject: back branches vs. VS 2008

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group