Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: back branches vs. VS 2008

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: back branches vs. VS 2008
Date: 2011-01-03 19:26:28
Message-ID: AANLkTikC_iFCb8HH1reqjCCZ66G4JgTjZfStFV6kcVs+@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> Incidentally, I just went looking for VS2005/Express on microsoft.com. I
> don't know if they still make it available, but if they do it's fairly well
> hidden. I could find VS2008/Express and VS2010/Express very easily. ISTM
> that having support on the live branches for the compilers/SDKs that
> Microsoft apparently actually supports and distributes is not a bad thing to
> have.

I agree.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-01-03 19:42:25
Subject: Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers (was: Extensions, patch v16)
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2011-01-03 19:23:33
Subject: Re: back branches vs. VS 2008

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group