From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Newall <postgresql(at)davidnewall(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: rollback to savepoint leads to transaction already in progress |
Date: | 2010-10-14 01:44:50 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTik91fy2ER0ydxxE4ZJOLXtBbfoDmQ8DQfqF5815@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 7:42 AM, David Newall
<postgresql(at)davidnewall(dot)com> wrote:
> Trivial program to demonstrate problem:
>
> main() {
> ECPGdebug(1,stderr);
> exec sql connect to postgres;
> exec sql set autocommit to off;
> exec sql start transaction;
> exec sql savepoint s;
> exec sql rollback to s;
> exec sql commit;
> return 0;
> }
>
> Output:
> [28397]: ECPGdebug: set to 1
> [28397]: ECPGconnect: opening database postgres on <DEFAULT> port <DEFAULT>
> [28397]: ECPGsetcommit on line 4: action "off"; connection "postgres"
> [28397]: ECPGtrans on line 5: action "start transaction"; connection "postgres"
> [28397]: ECPGtrans on line 6: action "savepoint s"; connection "postgres"
> [28397]: ECPGtrans on line 7: action "rollback to s"; connection "postgres"
> [28397]: ECPGtrans on line 8: action "commit"; connection "postgres"
> [28397]: ECPGnoticeReceiver: there is already a transaction in progress
> [28397]: raising sqlcode -603
>
> Problem:
> It shouldn't raise "there is already a transaction in progress" error,
> particularly when doing a commit. Remove "rollback to s" and no problem.
>
> Environment:
> ecpg (PostgreSQL 8.4.5) 4.5.0
> This appears to be a regression; it doesn't occur with ecpg (PostgreSQL
> 8.3.8) 4.4.1
The bug comes from string-based transaction control in ECPGtrans().
The code cannot distinguish ROLLBACK TRANSACTION and ROLLBACK TO savepoint.
----
if (strncmp(transaction, "commit", 6) == 0 || strncmp(transaction,
"rollback", 8) == 0)
con->committed = true;
else
con->committed = false;
----
I think the string-comparison is unreliable. So, I'd like to replace
the code to use PQtransactionStatus(). I have two patches to do it:
The first one (ecpg-trans-quick_20101014.patch) is a quick fix
that replaces only the above test.
The second one (ecpg-trans-full_20101014.patch) replaces all of
struct connection->committed with PQtransactionStatus().
Which solution is better? Or, another idea?
--
Itagaki Takahiro
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
ecpg-trans-full_20101014.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.2 KB |
ecpg-trans-quick_20101014.patch | application/octet-stream | 651 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Newall | 2010-10-14 06:52:25 | Re: rollback to savepoint leads to transaction already in progress |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-14 01:16:03 | Re: BUG #5694: Postgres ODBC SQLTables is not working correctly |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2010-10-14 02:03:16 | Re: string function - "format" function proposal |
Previous Message | Andrew Geery | 2010-10-14 01:41:46 | Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch |