Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Is timestamptz alias documented?

From: Chris <ctlajoie(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is timestamptz alias documented?
Date: 2010-12-07 18:48:33
Message-ID: AANLkTik1e5iqObZgKbA+WL0nXqe51cxjGG3BC0oHgAEJ@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> See table 8-1 here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/datatype.html
>
> We don't emphasize it, since it's a nonstandard Postgres-ism.

Thanks. I guess I understand why you don't want to emphasize a
non-standard Postgres feature. But why doesn't that page show up when
I do a search?

http://search.postgresql.org/search?u=/docs/9.0/static/&q=timestamptz

Chris

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-12-07 19:20:53
Subject: Re: Is timestamptz alias documented?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-12-07 18:35:53
Subject: Re: Is timestamptz alias documented?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group