On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Kaiting Chen" <kaitocracy(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> From this pg_hba configuration as the user 'kaiting.chen' is not in role
>> 'service' the second entry in the table should be skipped and he should
>> authenticate via GSSAPI. However this does not happen.
> I believe the definition of "in role" we use here is "has the privileges
> of role". Since kaiting.chen is a superuser, all privilege tests will
> succeed for him, including that one. IOW, a superuser is automatically
> a member of every role. This isn't a bug.
I guess it's not a bug if we did it that way on purpose, but it seems
like testing for actual group membership would be less surprising.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-11-28 13:05:12|
|Subject: Re: Documentation bug: Chapter 35.4, paragraph 4|
|Previous:||From: Balamurugan Mahendran||Date: 2010-11-28 08:01:00|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5773: DEBUG: reaping dead processes DEBUG: server
process (PID 10007) was terminated by signal 11: Segme|