On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> Le 24/08/2010 14:05, Magnus Hagander a écrit :
>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>> Le 24/08/2010 13:51, Dave Page a écrit :
>>>> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
>>>>> Actually, what happens if we try to use PQconnect() with
>>>>> applicaiton_name on an older version? I assume it fails, and not just
>>>>> works and ignores it?
>>>> iirc, yes.
>>> We have this in the log:
>>> FATAL: unrecognized configuration parameter "application_name"
>>> And then it connects.
>>> At least with a 9.0 libpq and a 8.3.0 PostgreSQL server.
>> Yeah, the interesting thing would be an 8.3 libpq, if you just throw
>> it the connection string and don't try to use PQparseconnInfo().
> It fails. If the user has a 8.3 libpq, we should not send the
> application_name connection parameter.
That means Dave is perfectly correct, and thus someone needs to write
that patch ;)
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Guillaume Lelarge||Date: 2010-08-24 20:33:58|
|Subject: Re: GSoC database modeler [Luis Ochoa]|
|Previous:||From: Guillaume Lelarge||Date: 2010-08-24 12:23:43|
|Subject: Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4|