Re: upper and UTF-8

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Benjamin Krajmalnik <kraj(at)servoyant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: upper and UTF-8
Date: 2010-07-26 21:58:26
Message-ID: AANLkTi=zTKL_=shdzrtNibyWoB5ST1PqB82KnfXPNE73@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Benjamin Krajmalnik <kraj(at)servoyant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, the database has to accept data in multiple languages, since it is a SaaS offering.
>
> The encoding determines that, not the collation.  UTF-8 allows you to
> insert various languages in that encoding.
>
>> It is not a big deal - I just found it interesting that it did not uppercase the accented letters.
>
> Just tested it and the lc_collate seems to make the difference.

To be more specific, when my lc_collate is en_US, it works properly.
I didn't have to use a spanish collation to make it work. Note that
changing collation will change sort order, and some matching rules and
things like that. Also, a db is usually noticeably faster working
with text in locale of C, because it then treats the data mostly as
though it's in byte order.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Irene Barg 2010-07-26 22:01:44 postgresql-server-8.4.4-1PGDG.el5 - ERROR: could not write block 503414 of temporary file: No space le,ft on device
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2010-07-26 21:51:58 Re: upper and UTF-8