Re: Indent authentication overloading

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Indent authentication overloading
Date: 2011-03-14 15:26:40
Message-ID: AANLkTi=ufrKMd2hGWJadFmveJXeshexL4kg1SeGLjSbM@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 16:17, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 14:43, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Also, the text is not accurate: nothing has been automatically changed
>>> to anything.  The pg_hba.conf file is just as it was.  You could say
>>> something like "ident" authentication on local socket treated as
>>> "peer", but I think a better idea would be to just remove this message
>>> altogether.
>
>> The idea being to let people know it's been deprecated, nothing else.
>> But sure, we can just remove the message - at elast for now, and maybe
>> add it $n releases down the road when people are expected to have
>> changed over.
>
> I'm with Robert on this one --- the first reaction I had to your
> description of the patch was "why do we need a log message for that?"
> If there were some real reason to push people away from use of the
> non-preferred term, maybe it'd be worth nagging them to change; but
> there isn't.

Ok. fair enough, I'll take that part out.

Are people in general in favor of making the change provided I do that, then?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-03-14 15:26:47 patch: tabcomple for pset - format and linestyle
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-03-14 15:21:15 Re: Macros for time magic values