Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Should psql support URI syntax?

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should psql support URI syntax?
Date: 2011-04-01 00:39:25
Message-ID: AANLkTi=tn8VpnY6WV-dvNcP95sRp_yFLUV_fV8UyVK7=@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
An advantage to this uri form is that it allows applications to be
configured uniformly - I do not need to ask "is this using libpq, needing
one sort of configuration, or Java, needing another?"

Rather, I may say, "here is a uri I may use with any of my applications"

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2011-04-01 00:49:22
Subject: Re: Should psql support URI syntax?
Previous:From: Thom BrownDate: 2011-04-01 00:24:20
Subject: Re: Foreign table permissions and cloning

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group