On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> Does try_relation_open need to have a lock acquisition timeout when AV
>> is calling it?
> Hmm. I think when looking at the AV code, I've always subconsciously
> assumed that try_relation_open would fail immediately if it couldn't get
> the lock. That certainly seems like it would be a more appropriate way
> to behave than delaying indefinitely.
I'm confused how that's not happening already. What does "try" mean, otherwise?
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-01-15 19:31:21|
|Subject: Re: ALTER TYPE 0: Introduction; test cases|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-01-15 19:27:21|
|Subject: Re: LOCK for non-tables|