On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> wrote:
> On 02/09/2011 04:16 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 09:09:48PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Frankly, I think this is an example of how our current shared memory
>>> model is a piece of garbage.
>> What other model(s) might work better?
> Thread based, dynamically allocatable and resizeable shared memory, as
> most other projects and developers use, for example.
Or less invasively, a small sysv shm to prevent the double-postmaster
problem, and allocate the rest using POSIX shm.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-02-09 17:26:47|
|Subject: Re: exposing COPY API|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-02-09 17:20:06|
|Subject: Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1|