On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 15:48, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 13:04, Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:52 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 5:14 AM, Alexey Klyukin wrote:
>>>> You mean packing both a string representation and a reference to a single SV * value?
>>> Dunno, I'm not a guts guy.
>> Well, neither me (I haven't used much of the guts api there).
> Find attached a proof of concept that modifies Alexey's patch to do
> the above (using the overload example I and others posted).
[ ... ]
> Thoughts? Should I polish this a bit more? Or do we like the GUC better?
So its been over a week with no comments. ISTM there were more people
against adding yet another GUC. Barring objection ill finish the
missing parts of the POC patch I posted and submit that.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dimitri Fontaine||Date: 2011-01-26 18:47:56|
|Subject: Re: Extensions support for pg_dump, patch v27|
|Previous:||From: Richard Broersma||Date: 2011-01-26 18:32:36|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Seeking Mentors for Funded Reviewers|