Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: A small update for postgresql.conf.sample

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers ML <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A small update for postgresql.conf.sample
Date: 2010-09-27 13:40:01
Message-ID: AANLkTi=kYockktRVcf2ByFwoz44HKtEYg=weySMQ8OTG@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
2010/9/27 Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>:
> Le 27/09/2010 15:18, Robert Haas a écrit :
>> 2010/9/27 Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>:
>>> Attached is a small patch that adds a few comments for the settings that
>>> require restart. Applicable for 9.0+.
>>
>> I'm not sure this is worth back-patching, but I've committed it to the
>> master branch.
>>
>
> +1 for backpatching.
>
> Otherwise, the fact that "requires restart" is not here doesn't mean
> anything (ie, doesn't mean if restart is required or not).
>
> Actually, I don't see any reason why not to backpatch it.

I was wondering if it would cause package management headaches for
people who had already modified their postgresql.conf.

No?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Devrim GÜNDÜZDate: 2010-09-27 13:42:36
Subject: Re: A small update for postgresql.conf.sample
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-09-27 13:38:38
Subject: Re: gist access methods parameter types

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group