Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: recovery.conf location

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: recovery.conf location
Date: 2010-09-27 08:02:46
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 08:34, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Maybe i'm missing something but this would be a problem if we put a
>> trigger file and the recovery.conf gets renamed to recovery.done, no?
>> at least that would be a problem for the standbys that still need to
>> be standbys
> That's not problem unless more than one standbys become master at the
> same time. Since recovery.conf is read by standby only at the start unless
> it's triggered, already-started standbys can work even if recovery.conf is
> renamed to recovery.done. Though it's somewhat tricky..

Uh, what if the slave is restarted for one reason or another? That
seems like it would be really fragile..

 Magnus Hagander

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dimitri FontaineDate: 2010-09-27 08:03:52
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Still more tweaking of git_changelog.
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-09-27 08:02:01
Subject: Re: recovery.conf location

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group