Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4
Date: 2010-08-26 11:41:39
Message-ID: AANLkTi=_yexyCAiqUcKsq7FULj4ess7SnDjVLy_koWM_@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> Le 26/08/2010 12:31, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>> I have absolutely no idea. But a quick look doesn't even get anything
>>> about how PG_SSL is handled by the VC project files.
>>
>> It's not - we assume the user is using our installers which always
>> have SSL support.
>>
>>
>
> OK. I've commited my patch. I think I'm mostly done, at least for a RC
> tomorrow morning. I now have to send an email to our translators.

Great - thanks!

-- 
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2010-08-26 12:54:08
Subject: pgAdmin III commit: Don't hard-code the application name - we shouldbe
Previous:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2010-08-26 11:31:05
Subject: Re: Issue with libpq < 8.4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group