Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: gSoC add MERGE command new patch -- merge_v104

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: gSoC add MERGE command new patch -- merge_v104
Date: 2010-08-25 00:18:19
Message-ID: AANLkTi=_TRn4e=WuQ+AJShxw3UW7AvbMhsvb6VZkxF8H@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Whats the plan to go forward at that subject? I think the patch needs
> to lock tables exclusively (the pg level, not access exclusive) as
> long as there is no additional handling...

That sounds like it might cause more problems than it solves.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-08-25 00:19:40
Subject: Re: SQLSTATE of notice PGresult
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-08-25 00:17:15
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #5305: Postgres service stops when closing Windows session

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group