On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> The proposed patch looks very simple. I don't think that applying that
>>> patch will cause serious risk.
>> Maybe so, maybe not, but *it won't get tested* to any meaningful degree
>> if it's applied.
> Umm.. I don't have good idea about this. Spend a lot time on the review?
The proposed patch changes only CopySnapshot in exec_simple_query.
But exec_bind_message seems to have the same problem. It calls
CopySnapshot on PortalHeapMemory, but calls FreeSnapshot on
MessageContext. Am I missing something?
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Maxim Boguk||Date: 2010-12-22 21:53:45|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5798: Some weird error with pl/pgsql procedure|
|Previous:||From: Fujii Masao||Date: 2010-12-22 06:24:47|
|Subject: Re: memory leaks? using savepoint|