From: | Robert Burgholzer <rburghol(at)vt(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: Vaccuuming every db in cluster fails to eliminate "execute a full-database VACUUM in..." |
Date: | 2010-10-10 15:58:40 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=SN7+mhWjVDNam=YC-r7ayY=uFNMecjXRPMS3N@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Tom,
Thanks for getting in touch. Unfortunately, I thought to myself "why
not drop the db in single mode under database postgres", which I did,
and which worked, and thus, I can no longer produce the error, nor can
I query the "phantom" table as you suggested. I can say that when I
tried to vacuum the table, it told me:
backend> vacuum annual_data_gwreplace
ERROR: relation "annual_data_gwreplace" does not exist
STATEMENT: vacuum annual_data_gwreplace
I restored, and now, I *think* things are going OK.
Thanks again,
r.b.
>If there is a row in pg_class that for some reason didn't get deleted
>when the table was dropped, you could just manually remove that row
>(ie, DELETE FROM pg_class WHERE ... as superuser). You'd still need
>another VACUUM to get the database's datfrozenxid updated, but
>after that things should be OK.
--
--
Robert W. Burgholzer
http://www.findingfreestyle.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lou Picciano | 2010-10-10 16:22:22 | Re: build from Source: 9.0.1 / 9.1-alpha1 cannot build modules |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-10 15:52:34 | Re: Re: Vaccuuming every db in cluster fails to eliminate "execute a full-database VACUUM in..." |