Re: Configuring synchronous replication

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Configuring synchronous replication
Date: 2010-09-24 15:29:55
Message-ID: AANLkTi=H1r+n9mBB0KzyrBOfH2xo7_-2Le5uhEL0__Dz@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> wrote:
>>  Configuring whether the
>> master will retain WAL for a disconnected slave on the slave is
>> outright byzantine.
>
> Again, I can't remember having proposed such a thing.

No one has, but I keep hearing we don't need the master to have a list
of standbys and a list of properties for each standby...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-09-24 17:49:27 pgsql: Still more .gitignore cleanup.
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-09-24 14:15:53 Re: Configuring synchronous replication

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-09-24 15:33:25 Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #5650: Postgres service showing as stopped when in fact it is running
Previous Message André Fernandes 2010-09-24 15:29:42 Re: Name column