On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> Le 30/10/2010 10:25, Dave Page a écrit :
>> Yeah, that's really nasty. I guess we need split the commands at ;.
> Yeah. If it's not between quotes. I don't like it at all, but I don't
> see another way of doing it.
>> I guess we should pass a flag down somehow to tell the function that
>> executes the query to do that and then we could also potentially get
>> rid of the double SQL boxes. I'm not looking at the code, but I
>> suspect that'll be nasty.
> We actually aren't required to add such a flag. We can check if the
> query contains "ALTER TYPE", and "ADD AFTER" or "ADD BEFORE".
That's knowledge I'd rather avoid hardwiring into the lower level
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Guillaume Lelarge||Date: 2010-10-31 16:44:14|
|Subject: Re: Ticket 269: Add support for 9.1 ALTER TYPE
new syntax for enum|
|Previous:||From: pgAdmin Trac||Date: 2010-10-31 06:21:50|
|Subject: [pgAdmin III] #273: Check the number of rows returned by a query|