On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I agree with you, but if we want it *this* release, on top of all the
> other features we have queued, then I suggest we compromise. If you hold
> out for more feature, you may get less.
> Statement timeout = 2 * (100ms + autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay) *
> tablesize/(autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit / vacuum_cost_page_dirty)
I'm inclined to think that would be a very dangerous compromise.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-01-17 01:52:43|
|Subject: Re: psql: Add \dL to show languages|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-01-17 01:49:32|
|Subject: Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index|