On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Jayant Kumar did some benchmarking of InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL and PG
>> came out 5 times faster. The benchmark isn't very thoroughly
>> described, but it turns out not to matter.
>> Apparently, the reason we're faster is that wal_sync_method =
>> open_datasync, which is the default on MacOS X, doesn't actually work.
> That might be true, but if you check the comments, Jayant replied to say:
> @Andrew : I am running linux - ubuntu 10.04 - kernel 2.6.32-24. Linux
> does not support fsync_writethrough
> So I don't think that invalidates his benchmark. Something else might
> of course...
Oh, I missed that. Actually, I wasn't really so concerned with
whether his benchmark is correct. I *am* concerned about being broken
out of the box on MacOS X.
(I also suspect problems with the benchmark. It's hard to believe
we're 5x faster than InnoDB on an apples-to-apples comparison on
trivial queries. I'd believe 20% either way, but 5x is a lot. But
that's a question for another day.)
The Enterprise Postgres Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-09-30 20:33:09|
|Subject: Re: Patch to reindex primary keys|
|Previous:||From: Gurjeet Singh||Date: 2010-09-30 20:23:00|
|Subject: Re: git diff --patience|